Article

DfT and the Spending Review: what to expect

Nobody knows until the day itself and even then, important details will probably trail out over the following few days.

By Steer

Of course, nobody knows until the day itself (October 20) and even then, important details will probably trail out over the following few days. And don’t forget the art of spin will be in play, even if this is an era of brutal truths. We have no inside knowledge, but there are plenty of tea leaves…So what can we expect? Something over 25% expenditure cut (but not 40%) means some dramatic changes. But they won’t be wrought overnight, or even in the first year: they will accumulate over the next four years to generate the headline number.

First, the bureaucracies. The Department itself will face cuts to match the headline savings. Newspaper reports have suggested that Cycling England, the Commission for Integrated Transport and the Disabled Persons' Transport Advisory Committee will all go. Already, of course, the RDAs, regional assemblies and Regional Government offices – each of which has had a major role in transport – have been targeted for close down.

As for the big picture, where the real savings decisions are made, expect to see much made of the distinction between revenue and capital accounts. Revenue plays to the efficiency and affordability question; capital also plays to the question of economic growth and employment. So big capital programmes that accord with wider government agendas (and this is to be the ‘greenest of governments’) may survive. Elsewhere, anticipate the application of ‘tough choices’.

Within the capital programme, the big spenders are the Highways Agency, local transport and the railways. Even if the Highways Agency capital programme is largely reduced to management measures, it would still be expensive. Unless there is an appetite to repeat the painful struggle to get the M25 PPP deal away, expect some substantial cuts here.

Local Transport capital projects are harder to tackle well in a single swing of the scythe. With a number of different promoters, DfT will want to put the pressure on getting some savings (‘value engineering’). The prospect of a new funding pot will be dangled, but promoters of many schemes will be told they are harbouring ‘no-hopers’.

It will be especially interesting to see how tough Government is prepared to be with TfL; we know already that the post-PPP tube upgrade faces major cut-backs (although Crossrail and Thameslink will transform many of the busiest Undergound stations). The question is over the £0.75bn that goes into London Buses each year: former transport minister Stephen Norris is fond of pointing out that in his day, the London bus subsidy was….zero.

For rail capital projects, we expect the position to be brighter, although still with the pressure to demonstrate that delivery costs are being put under intense pressure. So expect an early announcement that both Crossrail and Thameslink will survive, together with something of the electrification programme (with provisos around timing and efficiency).

High-speed rail will also get funding, but then (handily) there is the cash receipt from the sale of HS1 next year, which serves to generate the notion of a rolling fund. The recent decision on S and Y shaped networks carried an important re-positioning: London West Midlands will proceed first, with the northern limbs following 10 years later.

But it is the revenue account where the big savings have to come. That means lifting the constraint on regulated rail fares going up by only RPI+1 each year. The ambition in 2007 to get to a position where fare-payers contribute 75% and not 50% of rail finance looks like a candidate for a repeat dose. This time, the planned contribution from a strongly growing travel sector in a reasonably vibrant economy cannot be assumed to be so great.

The bus sector also consumes a substantial part of DfT’s annual budget. Bus Service Operators’ Grant will be reformed, with the emphasis placed on the adoption of smart-cards and a switch to a per-passenger pay-out. But the scale of the grant will need to be cut in the process. Whether the free travel concession for the over-60s can survive depends as much on whether there is a join up in government policy for this growing segment of the electorate. In purely transport terms, as the recent CILT survey showed, it doesn’t make much sense to continue as we are. Means testing might be the answer here.

But then, it would be surprising if there were no surprises.

Off

Subscribe to our newsletter, The Edit

We are Steer

Yes, you are in the right place. After 40 years, we have changed our name from Steer Davies Gleave to mark our growing international footprint and our expanding portfolio into sectors beyond transport.

Explore our new website to learn more about Steer: who we are, how we work and what our future holds.

Related insights

  • 22 Oct 2025
    Article

    Game Changers: The megatrends that will redefine global infrastructure

    Jon Peters
    Associate Director

    Our latest global insight report exploring the forces transforming how we move, power, and connect the world.

    Read more

  • 12 Jun 2025
    Article

    Comprehensive Spending Review: What is the outlook for transport, housing and infrastructure?

    By Steer

    CSR 2025 boosts housing, transport, energy; delivery, private investment, and public support are key.

    Read more

  • 11 Jun 2024
    Article

    Bridging India's infrastructure funding gap by 2025

    By Steer

    India aims for a USD 5 trillion economy by 2025, requiring USD 1.4 trillion in infrastructure investments and diverse funding sources.

    Read more

  • 05 Oct 2023
    Article

    HS2 and a new direction of travel: Network North

    Profile image
    Mike Goggin
    Managing Director - Transformation & Growth

    Join us on 11 Oct. to take stock of what the Government's new direction of transport means and what it implies for decisions and choices.

    Read more

  • 04 Aug 2023
    Article

    Managing the Net Zero transition: Steer’s six levers for a successful transition

    By Steer

    In March, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released their final report on the state of our warming planet.

    Read more

  • 30 May 2023
    Article

    Woodland asset transfers in Wales: Measuring the unmeasurable

    By Steer

    Nature-based solutions, public access to land, and the wellbeing benefits of being outdoors are topics which loom large in public discourse.

    Read more

  • 28 Nov 2022
    Article

    Steer Economic Development's response to the Autumn Statement

    By Steer

    The Autumn Statement is more of a one nation budget than its predecessor, recognising the necessity to use fiscal policy to support growth.

    Read more

  • 23 Nov 2022
    Article

    Steer views on the Autumn Statement 2022

    By Steer

    UK Chancellor Jeremy Hunt outlined three priorities of stability, growth and public services as part of his Autumn Statement.

    Read more

  • 31 Oct 2022
    Article

    Canada’s uneven economic recovery

    By Steer

    The pandemic created an uneven shock on the economy and labour market, which is still being felt today, roughly two and half years later.

    Read more

  • 28 Oct 2019
    Article

    Mind the gap: meeting the world's growing infrastructure investment needs

    By Steer

    Well-designed, delivered and functioning infrastructure is crucial to achieving economic growth in developed and emerging economies.

    Read more

  • 12 Nov 2018
    Article

    An all-door boarding solution

    By Steer

    The conversations regarding transit policy need to become increasingly passenger-focused.

    Read more

  • 08 Dec 2016
    Article

    Demonetisation and transport — can technology help?

    Serbjeet Kohli
    Director

    The Indian government's decision to demonetise 86% of currency notes came as a shock to the Indian economy and citizens.

    Read more